网课代考被抓,网课代上代修,北美网课代修,加拿大代考

成功案例

Essay代寫案例-動物應該像人類一樣被安樂死嗎?

來源:原創| 作者:iessaywritingr| 時間:2020-09-10 14:23
      本文是一篇essay代寫范文,題目為Should animals be euthanized as humans?本文主要討論了動物是否應該像人類一樣被安樂死。安樂死在需要動物幫助他們完成一些實驗的人們中越來越普遍。確實,協助死亡絕不排除可能提供的最佳姑息治療,而是融合了同情照顧和對患者自主權的尊重,最終使有尊嚴的死亡成為現實。
 
動物安樂死
 
 
Should animals be euthanized as humans?
 
      It is not uncommon that euthanasia is increasingly popular for people who need animals to help them to complete some experiments. It seems to be true that assisting death in no way precludes giving the best palliative care possible but rather integrates compassionate care and respect for the patient's autonomy and ultimately makes death with dignity a real option.
      安樂死對于那些需要動物幫助他們完成一些實驗的人來說越來越受歡迎。似乎確實,協助死亡決不排除給予最好的姑息治療,而是將同情心關懷和尊重病人自主性結合起來,最終使尊嚴地死亡成為一種真正的選擇。
 
      Admittedly, this kind of death , to some extent, could reduce the pain of the animals if they are necessary in the animal experiments. However, why do not we think about the problem that why human are always killing animals and find a very appropriate cause for themselves to claim to the world that we are do something that is beneficial to the animals by killing themselves to do the animal experiments. People always say that we have tried our best to protect the animals and to make them comfortable when they have to be confronted with death because of human. So, why do not these people also try this way when they realized they are needed in some fields?
      誠然,這種死亡,在一定程度上可以減輕動物的痛苦,如果動物實驗需要的話。然而,為什么我們不去思考為什么人類總是在殺戮動物,并為自己找到一個非常合適的理由來向世界宣稱,我們是在做一些對動物有益的事情,自殺來做動物實驗呢。人們總是說,我們盡了最大的努力保護動物,使它們在面對人類死亡時感到舒適。那么,當這些人意識到某些領域需要他們時,為什么不也嘗試一下呢?
 
      That is to say, opposing euthanasia to palliative care neither reflects the Dutch reality that palliative medicine is incorporated within end-of-life care nor the place of the option of assisted death at the request of a patient within the overall spectrum of end-of-life care even though people always find a variety of reasons to beautify this action.
      也就是說,反對安樂死與姑息治療既不反映荷蘭的現實,即姑息醫學被納入臨終關懷,也不反映在臨終關懷的整體范圍內,應病人的要求而選擇協助死亡,盡管人們總是找到各種理由美化這種行為。
 
      Some people would like to say that people have the rights to die if they have no living wills. More interestingly, they would quote these words to prove they are right.” "The right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. The exercise of this right is as central to personal autonomy and bodily integrity as rights safeguarded by this Court's decisions relating to marriage, family relationships, procreation, contraception, child rearing and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment”(Vacco,1996) .However, they might ignore a significant fact that it seems to be the right of people rather than animals. This is because it might be interesting that animal also would choose death when they are facing with the unfair treatment of their boss while working or with the discrimination resulting from the different status and salaries. Obviously, all these actions belongs to human rather than animals.
 
      We wish to take a strong stand against the separation and opposition between euthanasia and assisted suicide, on the one hand, and palliative care, on the other that such critics have implied even though the evidence for the emotional impact of assisted dying on physicians shows that euthanasia and assisted suicide are a far cry from being 'easier options for the caregiver' than palliative care, as some critics of practice have suggested. There is no 'either-or' with respect to these options (Kimsma, 2004). Every appropriate palliative option available must be discussed with the patient and, if reasonable, tried before a request for assisted death can be accepted.
In addition, laws should be established to against euthanasia and assisted suicide are in place to prevent abuse and to protect people from unscrupulous doctors and others. They are not, and never have been, intended to make anyone suffer.
 
      In conclusion, it is not fair for animals to die with euthanasia even though it seems that everything is appropriate for human. However, animals are not human and they should not be treated as human because of the different nature and qualities. Therefore, weather we should kill the animals with euthanasia should be thought over and over again.
來源聲明:本文章系iessaywritingr編輯原創或采編整理,如需轉載請注明來自iessaywritingr。以上內容部分(包含圖片、文字)來源于網絡,格式和內容僅供留學生參考學習,禁止抄襲。如有侵權,請及時與本站客服聯系,我們將在第一時間刪除。
本文關鍵詞:

Essay代寫案例网课代考被抓,网课代上代修,北美网课代修,加拿大代考

免責聲明

非常感謝您訪問我們的網站。在您使用本網站之前,請您仔細閱讀本聲明的所有條款。

网课代考被抓,网课代上代修,北美网课代修,加拿大代考1、本站部分內容來源自網絡,涉及到的部分文章和圖片版權屬于原作者,本站轉載僅供大家學習和交流,切勿用于任何商業活動。

2、本站源碼來自第三方網站建設平臺,如有侵犯知識產權請及時我們聯系。

3、本聲明未涉及的問題參見國家有關法律法規,當本聲明與國家法律法規沖突時,以國家法律法規為準。

4、如果侵害了您的合法權益,請您及時與我們,我們會在第一時間刪除相關內容!

聯系方式:19934379360
网课代考被抓,网课代上代修,北美网课代修,加拿大代考電子郵件:947017031@qq.com

免責聲明

非常感謝您訪問我們的網站。在您使用本網站之前,請您仔細閱讀本聲明的所有條款。

1、本站部分內容來源自網絡,涉及到的部分文章和圖片版權屬于原作者,本站轉載僅供大家學習和交流,切勿用于任何商業活動。

网课代考被抓,网课代上代修,北美网课代修,加拿大代考2、本站源碼來自第三方網站建設平臺,如有侵犯知識產權請及時我們聯系。

网课代考被抓,网课代上代修,北美网课代修,加拿大代考3、本聲明未涉及的問題參見國家有關法律法規,當本聲明與國家法律法規沖突時,以國家法律法規為準。

网课代考被抓,网课代上代修,北美网课代修,加拿大代考4、如果侵害了您的合法權益,請您及時與我們,我們會在第一時間刪除相關內容!

聯系方式:19934379360
网课代考被抓,网课代上代修,北美网课代修,加拿大代考電子郵件:947017031@qq.com

在線客服

售前咨詢
售后咨詢
微信號
Essay_Cheery
微信